Connect with us

Tech

India Is Building Its Own Chip — But Can It Survive the Hard Part?

Fabs are rising in Gujarat. Partners are committed. ₹76,000 crore is on the table. So why are India’s top engineers still losing sleep?GIN Desk · May 12, 2026 · ginmedia.co.in New Delhi: Somewhere on the outskirts of Dholera, Gujarat, on a flat stretch of land that was scrubland three years ago, the most strategically important construction project in India’s industrial history is quietly taking shape. The Tata Electronics semiconductor fabrication facility — India’s first commercial chip fab — is expected to begin trial production runs by late 2026, with full commercial output targeted for 2027. Built in partnership with Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC), the plant will initially manufacture chips at the 28-nanometre process node — not cutting-edge by global standards, but critically relevant for the majority of chips used in automobiles, industrial equipment, consumer electronics, defence systems, and telecommunications infrastructure. A second fab — the CG Power plant in Sanand, Gujarat, in partnership with Japan’s Renesas Electronics and Thailand’s Stars Microelectronics — is progressing in parallel, targeting analog and mixed-signal chips used in power management and sensing applications. A third facility, the Kaynes Semicon plant in Sanand, will focus on OSAT (Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Testing), the packaging and testing stage of chip production. The India Semiconductor Mission, launched with a ₹76,000 crore government incentive package in 2021, has finally moved from policy announcement to concrete and steel. Why semiconductors matter more than almost anything else The global chip shortage of 2021-2023 — which idled automobile factories, delayed laptop shipments, and disrupted supply chains across every sector — delivered a blunt lesson to every government on earth: a nation that cannot make its own chips is a nation whose economy can be held hostage by events ten thousand kilometres away. India currently imports semiconductors worth approximately $24 billion every year — making chips the country’s third-largest import category after crude oil and gold. Nearly 70 percent of those imports come from Taiwan and South Korea. The geopolitical risk embedded in that dependency — given the Taiwan Strait tensions that have persisted through 2025 and into 2026 — is not lost on New Delhi. For India’s defence sector, the dependency is even more acute. The Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, the Arjun Main Battle Tank, the Pinaka rocket system, and virtually every modern radar and communications platform used by the Indian Armed Forces depend on chips that India currently cannot make domestically. The Ministry of Defence has explicitly identified semiconductor self-reliance as a national security priority. The talent problem nobody wants to talk about Here is where the nervousness begins. Building a semiconductor fab is, arguably, the most technically complex industrial undertaking in modern manufacturing. It requires not just massive capital investment and cutting-edge equipment — it requires thousands of highly specialised engineers and technicians who know how to operate, maintain, and optimise equipment that costs hundreds of millions of dollars per unit. India currently does not have that workforce at scale. A 2025 assessment by the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA) estimated that India would need approximately 85,000 trained semiconductor professionals by 2030 to support its fabrication ambitions. Today, fewer than 12,000 Indians hold relevant qualifications and work experience. Several IITs have launched dedicated semiconductor engineering programmes, and MeitY has funded the establishment of chip design centres at universities in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune. But academic programmes take years to produce graduates, and semiconductor manufacturing experience cannot be taught in a classroom — it is acquired over years of factory-floor exposure. The Tata and CG Power fabs are addressing this partially by deploying PSMC and Renesas engineers in leadership and training roles for the first three to five years of operation, a model similar to how South Korea and Taiwan built their own semiconductor industries in the 1980s and 1990s — by learning from foreign partners before gradually indigenising the knowledge base. The equipment chokepoint There is a second problem that sits above even talent: equipment. Advanced semiconductor manufacturing requires extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines — equipment so specialised that only one company in the world, the Dutch firm ASML, makes them, and each machine costs approximately $350 million. India’s 28nm fabs do not yet require EUV machines — that node can be achieved with older deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography. But the moment India aspires to produce chips at 7nm or below — the process nodes used in smartphones, AI accelerators, and advanced military hardware — it will face the same equipment dependency that has made chip manufacturing a geopolitical flashpoint worldwide. This is not a near-term problem. It is a medium-term one. And the engineers and policymakers driving India’s semiconductor mission are watching the ASML supply situation, the US-China chip war, and the Taiwan question with a clarity of focus that goes well beyond the commercial. The bigger picture India’s chip ambition is not about competing with Taiwan or South Korea in the global semiconductor market. Not yet. It is about insurance — building enough domestic capability that the next global supply shock does not bring Indian manufacturing to its knees. By that more modest standard, the progress is real. Three fabs under construction. A government with genuine political will. A diaspora of Indian semiconductor engineers in Silicon Valley and TSMC’s fabs in Taiwan who are beginning, slowly, to look homeward. The hard part, as always in India, is not the beginning. It is the sustained, patient, unglamorous execution that follows. — GIN Desk | ginmedia.co.in

Published

on

https://ginmedia.co.in/
Photo: Shutterstock

Fabs are rising in Gujarat. Partners are committed. ₹76,000 crore is on the table. So why are India’s top engineers still losing sleep?
GIN Desk · May 12, 2026 · ginmedia.co.in

New Delhi: Somewhere on the outskirts of Dholera, Gujarat, on a flat stretch of land that was scrubland three years ago, the most strategically important construction project in India’s industrial history is quietly taking shape.

The Tata Electronics semiconductor fabrication facility — India’s first commercial chip fab — is expected to begin trial production runs by late 2026, with full commercial output targeted for 2027. Built in partnership with Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC), the plant will initially manufacture chips at the 28-nanometre process node — not cutting-edge by global standards, but critically relevant for the majority of chips used in automobiles, industrial equipment, consumer electronics, defence systems, and telecommunications infrastructure.

A second fab — the CG Power plant in Sanand, Gujarat, in partnership with Japan’s Renesas Electronics and Thailand’s Stars Microelectronics — is progressing in parallel, targeting analog and mixed-signal chips used in power management and sensing applications. A third facility, the Kaynes Semicon plant in Sanand, will focus on OSAT (Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Testing), the packaging and testing stage of chip production.

The India Semiconductor Mission, launched with a ₹76,000 crore government incentive package in 2021, has finally moved from policy announcement to concrete and steel.

Why semiconductors matter more than almost anything else

The global chip shortage of 2021-2023 — which idled automobile factories, delayed laptop shipments, and disrupted supply chains across every sector — delivered a blunt lesson to every government on earth: a nation that cannot make its own chips is a nation whose economy can be held hostage by events ten thousand kilometres away.

India currently imports semiconductors worth approximately $24 billion every year — making chips the country’s third-largest import category after crude oil and gold. Nearly 70 percent of those imports come from Taiwan and South Korea. The geopolitical risk embedded in that dependency — given the Taiwan Strait tensions that have persisted through 2025 and into 2026 — is not lost on New Delhi.

For India’s defence sector, the dependency is even more acute. The Tejas Light Combat Aircraft, the Arjun Main Battle Tank, the Pinaka rocket system, and virtually every modern radar and communications platform used by the Indian Armed Forces depend on chips that India currently cannot make domestically. The Ministry of Defence has explicitly identified semiconductor self-reliance as a national security priority.

The talent problem nobody wants to talk about

Here is where the nervousness begins. Building a semiconductor fab is, arguably, the most technically complex industrial undertaking in modern manufacturing. It requires not just massive capital investment and cutting-edge equipment — it requires thousands of highly specialised engineers and technicians who know how to operate, maintain, and optimise equipment that costs hundreds of millions of dollars per unit.

India currently does not have that workforce at scale.

A 2025 assessment by the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA) estimated that India would need approximately 85,000 trained semiconductor professionals by 2030 to support its fabrication ambitions. Today, fewer than 12,000 Indians hold relevant qualifications and work experience.

Several IITs have launched dedicated semiconductor engineering programmes, and MeitY has funded the establishment of chip design centres at universities in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Pune. But academic programmes take years to produce graduates, and semiconductor manufacturing experience cannot be taught in a classroom — it is acquired over years of factory-floor exposure.

The Tata and CG Power fabs are addressing this partially by deploying PSMC and Renesas engineers in leadership and training roles for the first three to five years of operation, a model similar to how South Korea and Taiwan built their own semiconductor industries in the 1980s and 1990s — by learning from foreign partners before gradually indigenising the knowledge base.

The equipment chokepoint

There is a second problem that sits above even talent: equipment. Advanced semiconductor manufacturing requires extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines — equipment so specialised that only one company in the world, the Dutch firm ASML, makes them, and each machine costs approximately $350 million.

India’s 28nm fabs do not yet require EUV machines — that node can be achieved with older deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography. But the moment India aspires to produce chips at 7nm or below — the process nodes used in smartphones, AI accelerators, and advanced military hardware — it will face the same equipment dependency that has made chip manufacturing a geopolitical flashpoint worldwide.

This is not a near-term problem. It is a medium-term one. And the engineers and policymakers driving India’s semiconductor mission are watching the ASML supply situation, the US-China chip war, and the Taiwan question with a clarity of focus that goes well beyond the commercial.

The bigger picture

India’s chip ambition is not about competing with Taiwan or South Korea in the global semiconductor market. Not yet. It is about insurance — building enough domestic capability that the next global supply shock does not bring Indian manufacturing to its knees.

By that more modest standard, the progress is real. Three fabs under construction. A government with genuine political will. A diaspora of Indian semiconductor engineers in Silicon Valley and TSMC’s fabs in Taiwan who are beginning, slowly, to look homeward.

The hard part, as always in India, is not the beginning. It is the sustained, patient, unglamorous execution that follows.

— GIN Desk | ginmedia.co.in

Tech

Indian equity markets swing on IT-sector drag vs. broader gainsSensex and Nifty opened higher today

Indian markets opened higher, but IT stocks slipped amid H-1B fee concerns while consumer and auto stocks supported broader gains.

Published

on

Illustration generated for editorial use | Global Insight News

How the Day Actually Played Out

Morning open (positive): Sensex opened up 42.51 points (0.06%) at 74,901.50, and Nifty added 39.75 points to open at 23,454.05, as crude oil cooling below $100/barrel and softer US 10-year bond yields lifted sentiment. Asian markets broadly supported this — South Korea’s Kospi jumped 1.9%, Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 0.36%, and Wall Street had closed Monday near an all-time high.

But by the close, IT and financials dragged the whole market into the red:

  • Nifty50 closed at 23,329, down 85.30 points (0.36%) — snapping a four-day winning streak
  • Sensex closed at 74,529.08, down 329.91 points (0.44%)
  • Nifty MidCap and SmallCap also finished slightly lower (−0.08% and −0.23%)
  • TCS, Trent, and Tata Consumer Products ended as the day’s top Nifty50 losers

The IT Sector’s Specific Damage

Through the session, individual stock moves included:

  • HCL Tech: down as much as 2.44% intraday, closing among the sharpest losers — one report clocked it down 1.82% by midday, another at −2%
  • Tech Mahindra: down 1.4–1.5%
  • Infosys: down roughly 0.7–1.4% depending on the reading
  • TCS: ended as one of the Nifty50’s top three losers outright

Why the Reversal — More Than Just H-1B

While the H-1B fee fallout is the sector-specific driver for IT, several other forces converged on the broader market Tuesday:

  • Geopolitical uncertainty and elevated global bond yields kept investors cautious even after the morning’s positive cues
  • Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) turned net sellers, offloading ₹576.20 crore worth of equities the previous session (Sept 21) — though Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) stayed net buyers, purchasing ₹2,797.27 crore, partially cushioning the fall
  • Crude oil, despite cooling roughly 7% over the prior five sessions, saw a slight rebound intraday after touching a low of $99.90/barrel — reviving some inflation-related caution

The Structural IT Story Behind the Daily Noise

This isn’t just a one-day blip — IT has been a serial underperformer through 2026, and the reasons compound each other:

  • Elevated US interest rates discourage corporate tech spending, since tighter monetary policy makes companies cut client technology budgets and delay non-essential software projects — directly hitting revenue growth for Indian IT exporters, who earn the majority of their revenue overseas
  • Trump-era tariffs, AI-led disruption to traditional outsourcing/services models, and the US-Iran war’s economic ripple effects have all weighed on the sector over the past year
  • Indian IT firms draw over 50% of revenue from the US alone, making them unusually exposed to American policy and macro swings compared to sectors with more domestic-facing revenue

The “Two-Speed Market” Framing Holds Up

Your instinct on this is right — it’s a genuinely clean editorial narrative: on the same day, Coal India (+2.6%), Jio Financial (+2.5%), Dr Reddy’s (+1.5%), Adani Enterprises (+1.3%), and HDFC Life (+1%) were among gainers, while IT names sat at the bottom of the leaderboard. Of the 50 Nifty stocks, 28 traded positive and 21 negative — so breadth was roughly balanced, but the concentration of pain in IT specifically (a sector that’s been bleeding all year) makes for a strong visual “IT vs everyone else” segment.

Continue Reading

Tech

India Semiconductor Mission enters Phase 2 ($13.5B)At SEMICON India 2026 in New Delhi

India launches Semiconductor Mission Phase 2 with $13.5 billion in funding and major global investments to strengthen domestic chip manufacturing.

Published

on

Illustration generated for editorial use | Global Insight News

The Official Numbers

The Union Cabinet approved Semicon 2.0 on July 15, 2026, with a fiscal outlay of ₹1,27,500 crore (~$13.5–15 billion depending on the source and exchange rate used) — up from Phase 1’s ₹76,000 crore (~$8 billion). Gazette notifications for the scheme were issued August 31, and guidelines for all six strategic pillars were released just before the SEMICON India 2026 event opened.

Semicon 1.0 by the numbers: the original ₹76,000 crore outlay is now almost fully committed — ₹64,000 crore went to chip fabs, ₹10,000 crore to the semiconductor lab, and ₹1,000 crore to the Design-Linked Incentive scheme. As of December 2025, 10 projects had been approved with a combined investment of over ₹1.6 lakh crore, spread across six states: Gujarat, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Odisha, and Andhra Pradesh.

The Event Itself

SEMICON India 2026 ran September 17–19 at Yashobhoomi (IICC), New Delhi, under the theme “Business Opportunities Await” / “Silicon to Systems: Building the Ecosystem.” It drew 535 exhibiting companies — up 52% from 351 in 2025 and nearly double 2024’s 271 — with the sharpest growth notably not in chipmakers themselves, but in the companies that fabs buy from once construction gets real: cleanroom and utility contractors, specialty gas and chemical suppliers, and metrology/inspection tool vendors. That shift is being read as a signal India’s chip push has moved from announcements into actual procurement.

What Modi Actually Said

Framing India as a “trusted manufacturing destination” amid global supply-chain diversification, Modi called on companies to strengthen capabilities across the entire value chain — design, equipment, materials, testing, and packaging — and specifically appealed to Indian researchers working abroad to “join the development of advanced technologies in India.” He also pointed to new regulatory changes enabling partnerships between global companies, Indian startups, and design houses — a notable opening for foreign firms to plug directly into India’s smaller domestic players rather than only building their own standalone facilities.

The Big Corporate Commitments

Applied Materials — “India Vision 2035” ($5 billion)
Announced by executive Prabhu Raja, this includes a planned 140-acre research park plus broader investment across research, equipment components, and materials over roughly a decade — one of the most significant single commitments of the show.

Lam Research (~₹10,000 crore)
Its first Indian manufacturing plan, focused on silicon components — a materially different bet than assembling finished tools, since it puts actual component manufacturing (not just R&D or sales) onshore.

Fujifilm (~₹800 crore)
A separate materials-facility investment, adding to the growing “supply chain around the fabs” story.

Tata Electronics — 16 MoUs
CEO Randhir Thakur announced Tata would sign 16 memoranda of understanding during the event, with partners including Nexperia, BESI, JSR, Fujifilm, L&T Semiconductors, and Inox Air Products — spanning fabrication, packaging, materials, cleanroom infrastructure, design, and workforce development, tied to the Gujarat and Assam projects specifically.

The Flagship Project: Tata’s Dholera Fab

This remains the centerpiece of India’s entire chip ambition:

  • A 300mm (12-inch), AI-enabled fabrication facility built with Taiwan’s Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (PSMC)
  • Targeting 50,000 wafer starts per month at 28nm–110nm process nodes — covering automotive chips, industrial microcontrollers, AI accelerators, IoT devices, and display drivers
  • Total investment: ₹91,000 crore (Dholera fab) — Tata’s combined outlay for Dholera plus its Assam (Jagiroad) packaging facility is ₹1.18 lakh crore, with the government covering 50% of eligible capex on a pari-passu basis
  • Thakur said Tata has brought together more than 450 ecosystem partners just for Dholera’s construction, equipment, chemicals, and materials needs
  • Separately, Tata has also partnered with Dutch lithography giant ASML on technology, training, and supply-chain development
  • Tata says both Dholera and the Assam packaging plant are on schedule, with the combined projects expected to generate nearly 50,000 direct and indirect jobs. Company-wide, Tata Electronics says it has already created over 150,000 direct jobs, with 65% of its workforce being women, including from rural and marginalized communities

Other Notable Progress Already on the Ground

This isn’t purely future-tense — some projects are already shipping:

  • Kaynes Semicon’s OSAT unit in Sanand reached commercial production in March 2026, just 14 months after breaking ground, and shipped India’s first commercially produced multi-chip modules (900 units) to Alpha & Omega Semiconductor back in October 2025 — with plans to scale to 6.3 million chips per day
  • Micron’s Sanand assembly/test facility ($2.75 billion) is also under construction, using the same contractor (Tata Projects) as the Dholera fab
  • CG Semi’s OSAT facility in Sanand was inaugurated by Modi on July 4, 2026
  • India is also pushing toward more advanced nodes: officials have said the roadmap moves from current 28nm capability toward 5–7nm chip manufacturing over time, to close the gap with global leaders

The “Sovereignty” Framing — Why It Matters

India currently imports roughly 90% of its semiconductor needs, and the domestic market is projected to be worth over $100 billion by 2030, with the broader ecosystem potentially adding 600,000 jobs. Given semiconductors’ role in everything from smartphones to defense electronics to AI infrastructure, ISM Phase 2 is being pitched less as an industrial policy story and more as a strategic autonomy story — reducing reliance on Taiwan, China, and the US amid a period of heightened global chip-supply nationalism (a theme that connects directly to your earlier segments on US-China chip tensions and Nvidia/OpenAI/Google’s custom silicon race).

Continue Reading

Tech

H-1B visa fee extension hammers Indian IT stocks

Trump’s H-1B fee extension sends Indian IT stocks lower as companies face higher visa costs, added scrutiny and recurring renewal expenses.

Published

on

Illustration generated for editorial use | Global Insight News

The Timeline — This Has Been Building Since Last Year

  • September 2025: Trump first imposed the $100,000 H-1B fee, with only a one-day implementation window (anyone entering the US after 12:01am Sept 21, 2025 was covered) — Nasscom called this deadline “unrealistic and disruptive.” Indian IT stocks lost ₹85,500 crore in market cap in a single day on that original announcement, with the Nifty IT index falling nearly 3%.
  • December 2025: A US federal judge upheld the fee as lawful.
  • June 2026: A different federal judge — District Judge Leo Sorokin — struck it down, ruling bluntly that “the President had no power or delegated authority to impose a tax on H-1B petitions.” That ruling was stayed pending appeal, so the fee kept operating anyway.
  • August 25, 2026: The administration formally proposed codifying the fee as a $103,265 regulation.
  • September 18–19, 2026: Trump signed a new proclamation extending the restrictions for another 12 months, through September 21, 2027.

The Numbers That Matter for India Specifically

  • Indians accounted for 71% of all approved H-1B petitions in FY2024 (USCIS data) — by far the largest nationality group, with China a distant second at ~12%.
  • Trump’s own proclamation claims the fee has already caused a 92% decline in H-1B registrations from large IT outsourcing companies — effectively confirming the policy is working as intended against Indian IT firms’ traditional staffing model.
  • India’s IT sector is worth $315 billion, drawing roughly 57% of its revenue from the US market.

Important Nuance: It’s Not as Catastrophic as It First Sounds

Two clarifications matter for accuracy:

  • The $100,000 fee applies only to new H-1B petitions, not existing visa holders or routine renewals — a White House clarification that came out within hours of the original 2025 announcement and eased some panic.
  • Indian IT companies have been structurally reducing H-1B dependence for years — shifting toward hiring local US staff instead of rotating talent from India — which is precisely why Nasscom argues the fee’s real-world bite may be smaller than headlines suggest, even as it still objects on principle.

Nasscom’s Position (India’s IT Industry Body)

Nasscom’s response after the September 19 extension was notably measured but pointed:

  • It warned the changes “can potentially have ripple effects on America’s innovation ecosystem and the wider job economy,” and would disrupt business continuity for onshore projects, requiring companies to “work closely with clients to adapt.”
  • Back in August, Nasscom highlighted that the Indian IT industry has invested over $1.1 billion in US STEM talent pipelines and worker upskilling — arguing this context should factor into any fee decision.
  • Some industry voices have said they see no immediate adverse impact over the next 6–12 months since the hike only affects the next application cycle — but caution a deferred impact is still likely if the policy holds.

The Separate “9-11” Fee Rule — Why It’s the Sneakier Story

This is the part with less press coverage but arguably more direct financial bite: effective September 9, 2026, the expanded Biometric Entry-Exit Fee rule now charges employers $4,000 per H-1B extension and $4,500 per L-1 extension — even for the same employee, same company, just extending an existing visa. Analysts flagged this as the sharper sting for the stock selloff that week, since it converts what was once an occasional cost into a recurring annual line item specifically for firms built around onshore Indian engineers.

Additional Political Layer

Trump also signed an executive order directing federal agencies to apply greater scrutiny to H-1B applications from companies conducting layoffs — a rule that could complicate matters for IT majors simultaneously downsizing in some units while trying to bring in specialized talent elsewhere, adding a compliance headache on top of the direct cost increase.

Bottom Line for Your Segment

This is really a three-layer squeeze on Indian IT: (1) the $100,000 new-application fee, now locked in through 2027, (2) the newer $4,000–$4,500 recurring renewal fee hitting existing staff, and (3) added scrutiny tied to layoffs — landing on a sector already down roughly 24–37% for the year depending on the stock. Nasscom’s own language — “ripple effects,” “business continuity…disrupted” — signals real concern even while downplaying panic.

Continue Reading

Trending